During the first presidential debate, Al Gore mentioned the word
"family" 13 times and said "parents" four times. George W. Bush
referred to "families" twice and "parents" once.
Neither said "single" or "unmarried," so it's no small
wonder that Yvonne Farrell is feeling left out this election season. The 38-year-old
programs assistant at St. Alban's Parish in Washington is unmarried and she feels like
none of the presidential or vice presidential candidates is paying her any attention.
"I go through the campaign literature ... and all I see is
family, family, family," said Farrell, who is divorced with no children. "They
shouldn't act like we're poison."
Unmarried voters without children are casualties of the battle
between Democrats and Republicans as to which party can wave the family-values flag
higher, said Thomas Coleman, executive director of the Los Angeles-based advocacy group
American Association for Single People.
Having been cast as opposing family values in past presidential
races and tainted by the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Democrats feel they have to "look
more family-oriented and say 'families' more than the Republicans," Coleman said.
"They want to win the family-values debate," he said.
"We have nothing against that, but how about a little more balance?"
Even Ralph Nader, a bachelor who is the Green Party's presidential
candidate, has ignored issues important to singles. When a 34-year-old single woman
attending the third presidential debate in St. Louis asked George W. Bush and Al Gore what
they would do for her, both passed up an opportunity to make a pitch to single voters.
Almost 80 million people, or about 40 percent of people over age 18,
are widowed, divorced or have never married, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
"You're treated like a social leper," said Charlie Hoeck,
48, an Orlando library worker who is divorced. "That's why I like Nader so much. He's
a social leper too, so it's easy for me to relate to him."
To rectify the situation, the American Association for Single People
has launched a $114,000 advertising campaign drawing attention to unmarried voters without
children. Ads have run in USA Today and the Los Angeles Times and will run later in
Student Leader, The Village Voice and L.A. Weekly.
"Are you one of the 80 million single or unmarried adults
ignored by the George W. Bush and Al Gore campaigns?" the ad said. "How many
ways are we discriminated against? Let us count them for you."
Single people receive fewer job benefits, such as health insurance
for spouses and children, according to the ad. They are often lumped into a "high
risk" class by insurance companies and charged a higher rate than their married
co-workers. They are denied "family" discounts for roommates or partners.
Married couples are not taxed by the federal government for workplace benefits or
inheritance when a spouse dies, while unmarried people are taxed under similar
There is no federal protection against marital bias in employment,
housing or business transactions, the ad said.
Susan Sulsky, 46, who works in advertising sales for the Los Angeles
Times, would just like to have the same family-leave time parents get in case she wants to
take care of an ailing neighbor or a close friend.
"If you're single without children, you create you're own
family," said Sulsky, who is unmarried in Los Angeles.
Republican vice presidential candidate Dick Cheney disagrees that
the Bush campaign is ignoring singles.
"I don't feel that we've discriminated against anybody on the
basis of whether they are married or single," Cheney said this week during a stop in
Gore campaign spokesman Liz Lubow said that while the campaign
doesn't have any specific proposals targeting singles, unmarried people would benefit from
Gore policies affecting everyone, such as a patient bill of rights and a tax credit for
employers who train workers.
"Certainly Al Gore and Joe Lieberman are fighting for
everyone," Lubow said.
Reform Party presidential candidate Pat Buchanan said his campaign
doesn't have any specific proposals for unmarried people.
"All my proposals are pretty much directed to all
Americans," he said during a campaign stop in +Orlando+. "I'm not a big believer
in group rights."
While mostly silent on singles, here's what the major presidential
candidates are offering families and married people:
_ Bush has proposed doubling the child tax credit to $1,000 and
reducing the marriage penalty paid by many two-income couples by allowing a deduction of
10 percent of the lower-earning spouse's salary, up to $30,000.
_ Gore wants to expand the tax credit for child care expenses so
families can claim half of expenses, up from 30 percent, allow parents at home with babies
up to age 1 to claim care expenses of $500 and expand the family leave law to cover
employees in firms with 25 or more workers. Gore also supports raising the standard
deduction for married couples to ease the marriage penalty for those who do not itemize
The major candidates are ignoring a large segment of the electorate,
said Natural Law Party presidential candidate John Hagelin, a member of the American
Association of Single People, who is on the ballot in 41 states.
"There is a continuous pandering to working middle-class
families," said Hagelin, who is divorced with no children. "I don't understand
the pandering to that important interest group when there are as many single people and
they don't seem to be mentioned."
Singles may never become a potent political force because the group
is always changing.
"There are always people entering it and there are people
leaving it," Coleman said. "When you're a women or if you're black, you're that
Orlando attorney Kurt Brewer, who is single, doesn't have a problem
with the emphasis on families.
"The presidential race is only a simple reflection of the way
society treats singles," said Brewer, a 31-year-old Republican who is voting for
Bush. "Honestly, I don't care. I understand the social policy behind supporting
This story was carried by newspapers from coast to coast.