| This page contains news for the period May 29, 2001 through May 31, 2001.
|
<<
May 2001 >>
| S |
M |
T |
W |
Th |
F |
S |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
| 13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
| 20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
| 27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 30, 2001
Protecting your interest while living
together
A story published today by the Baltimore Sun reports that a
trend recently revealed by the new U.S. Census data shows that more and more unmarried
couples are cohabitating together. Over the past decade, the number of unmarried couples
living together grew 72 percent to 5.5 million couples. Census Bureau's Martin O'Connell
stipulates that the increase may come from "echo boomers," a large generation
now entering its early 20s, choosing to share a household with a mate rather than marry.
Baby boomers are also opting to live with a partner before embarking on a second marriage,
he says.
That means if unmarried couples want to protect their
interests, they need to take some financial steps. And the first move, experts say, is for
partners to discuss financial expectations and what will be "yours, mine and
ours."
Experts recommend unmarried couples consider these other
financial steps:
Powers of attorney
If one partner becomes incapacitated, the other will need power of attorney to
handle the ailing partner's finances. Each partner also will need a health care power of
attorney to make medical decisions for an incapacitated partner. This document also may be
needed to protect a partner's right to make hospital visits, says Mary Agnes Sheehan, an
estate-planning lawyer in Bethesda, Md.
Because hospitals sometimes allow only one visitor, Sheehan
recommends including specific language in the health care document "giving the power
of attorney the right to visit and to determine who gets to visit."
Will
Die without a will and state law determines which relative
gets what.
Letter of instruction
Disputes can arise at death between a surviving partner and
family members about burial, and particularly about cremation. In a letter of instruction,
you can list your wishes and name someone to make funeral decisions on your behalf.
Beneficiaries
Individual retirement accounts, life insurance policies,
401(k) accounts and even some stock options allow you to name a beneficiary. To avoid
confusion and ensure your assets go to the desired heir, make sure your beneficiary
designations are in sync with your will and property titles. Beneficiaries named on an
account or policy override a will, says Sheehan.
Cohabitation agreement
A cohabitation or domestic partnership agreement can spell
out how assets will be split when a couple parts, whether mediation will be sought, or if
one partner will receive financial support. "The purpose of a domestic-partnership
agreement is to create the rules of divorce," says Harold Lustig, a San Francisco
financial planner and an author.
"There is no element of built-in protection unless they
put this in a contract," Lustig says.
Estate planning
A married couple can leave unlimited assets free of federal
estate tax to the surviving spouse. Unmarried individuals, on the other hand, can leave up
to $675,000 to a partner or other heirs tax-free. Those with sizable estates will need to
do some estate planning to avoid hefty estate taxes. That may include buying life
insurance to pay potential estate or inheritance taxes, experts say.
Titling property
For unmarried couples, property ownership basically will be
determined by how assets are titled. Joint tenancy with rights of survivorship, for
instance, would means that when one partner dies, the other automatically becomes sole
owner. A drawback for someone with a high net worth is that at death the full value of the
house will be considered part of the federal taxable estate.
Retirement planning
Because unmarried couples won't be eligible for survivor's
benefits from Social Security or traditional pensions, they must set aside additional
assets for retirement, says Gay Abarbanell, a financial planner in Culver City, Calif.
Canadian province increases
domestic partner rights
A story released today by the Canadian Press reports that the Canadian province of
Manitoba is proposing to change a long list of legislation that would give gay couples the
same benefits as heterosexual couples but stopped short in the issue of adoption.
The legislation, which would change 10 provincial acts primarily dealing with pension
and survivor benefits, was introduced in the Manitoba legislature by Attorney General Gord
Mackintosh.
The Saskatchewan government also announced Wednesday it is amending 24 acts to give
unmarried, opposite and same-sex couples the same legal rights as married couples.
The changes are required to bring provincial laws in line with a 1999 Supreme Court of
Canada ruling.
Karen Busby, a law professor at the University of Manitoba who says she is a lesbian,
was disappointed not to see adoption in the Manitoba amendments.
When asked why adoption wasn't included in the Manitoba legislation, Mackintosh said
adoption wasn't part of the Supreme Court decision which dealt primarily with financial
issues.
"We're doing this because it's the right thing to do both in terms of the law of
the land and out of respect for the dignity and security of the rights of all
Manitobans," he said.
"I suspect that they didn't include it because there was opposition from some
government MLAs and the Opposition," said Busby.
In Saskatchewan, same-sex couples have been allowed to apply to adopt children
unrelated to them since 1990. As a result of the changes introduced Wednesday, same-sex
and common-law couples in Saskatchewan will be able to apply to adopt the children of
their partners, a Justice Department spokesman said.
Ontario and Quebec changed their laws in 1999 to comply with the Supreme Court ruling.
British Columbia has allowed gay couples to adopt since 1996 but has also made other
changes to legislation in the wake of the high court decision.
|