Back to Recent
U.S. News Archive
U.S. News Archive
September 21 - September 27, 2000
This page contains news for
the period September 21, 2000 through September 27, 2000.
September 2000 >>
| Wednesday, September 27, 2000
Marital status of men and women affect their preferences in presidential candidates
A story published today by the Los Angeles Times reports that
overwhelming support among men has powered George W. Bush back ahead in the race for the
White House, a new Times Poll has found.
Less than six weeks before the Nov. 7 election, the survey finds men
and women diverging on their presidential choices to a large degree.
While women prefer Vice President Al Gore by 7 percentage points,
men give Bush a crushing 22-point advantage--enough to provide the Texas governor a
48%-42% overall lead among likely voters, the poll found.
The Times Poll surveyed 1,052 registered voters, including 694
likely voters, from Sept. 23 through Sept. 25. All the results reported in this story were
taken from the 694 voters considered likely to turn out in November; for those voters the
survey has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Three other surveys released Tuesday showed Bush regaining the lead over Gore, though his
margins were narrower than in the Times result: The Texan led by 2 percentage points in
the daily Gallup/USA Today/CNN survey, 2 points in a survey by independent pollster John
Zogby and 3 points in the daily tracking poll by the political Web site Voter.com.
With election day nearing, the Times Poll found each candidate
successfully consolidating his base. Fully 94% of Republicans say they are voting for
Bush; among Democrats, 86% say they are backing Gore. Independents preferred Bush over
Gore by 11 percentage points in The Times survey.
The larger story among independents--like virtually every group in
the poll--is gender. Gore remains strong among women but not nearly as strong as Bush is
among men. The pattern recurs when looking at virtually any category of men and women.
Why is Bush running better with men than Gore is
with women? One reason that Bush is running better with men than Gore is with women is the
"marriage gap"--a powerful demographic force that usually receives less
attention than the "gender gap."
Bush has retained the usual Republican lead among married men, who
prefer him over Gore by that recurrent 2-1 ratio. Gore remains strong among single women,
leading Bush in that Democratic-leaning group by about 3 to 1.
But Bush is outperforming Gore among the two traditional swing
groups: single men and married women. Bush is holding Gore to a dead heat among single
men--a group President Clinton carried comfortably in 1992 and 1996, according to network
More dramatically, Bush leads by 51% to 40% among married women--and
by 16 percentage points among white married women.
Bush's advantage among married women--the principal target for his
"compassionate conservative" and education reform messages--allows him to hold
down Gore's overall margin among women; at the same time, Bush's competitiveness among
single men allows him to swell his overall margin among men.
Notwithstanding these results, the poll also highlights the forces
that have both camps predicting a photo finish.
The story does not mention the fact that neither Bush nor Gore have
done any outreach to single and unmarried voters as such. Neither of these
candidates has uttered the words "single people" or discussed the issue of
marital status discrimination.
They both have appealed to married couples, families, and parents.
But both candidates are silent when it comes to single people, instead taking this
constituency for granted.
Thursday, September 21, 2000
Churches are reaching out to
A story published today in the Christian Science Monitor reports
that single moms and dads have a new and somewhat unexpected ally: their neighborhood
In a ministerial about-face, churches from Nashville, Tenn., to Seattle are opening
"single-parent ministries." This effort to embrace single parents, many of whom
are mothers struggling to make ends meet after divorce or loss of welfare, not only offers
opportunity for counseling and klatching, but also practical help such as car repairs,
rent money, and babysitting.
Once shunned by many churches as "sinners," the nation's 13 million single
parents and their kids are increasingly being viewed as the "widows and orphans"
Jesus tended in the Bible. With more single moms and dads likely to come off the welfare
rolls in 2001, a rising number of congregations are dusting off the welcome mat with an
invigorated sense of Christian duty.
"The church [in general] in the past has fallen down on the job as far as helping the
single poor," says Darlene Bruce, a group leader at Cary Church of God here and
herself a divorcée with two children. "Now, it's almost like we're being forced to
change because of the sheer multitude of single parents. Whatever the reason, we're doing
it, we're catching the vision."
This idea of ministering to the needs of single parents has blossomed among religious
leaders, especially in the past few years. One-hundred-fifty church representatives
attended a Nashville conference last fall on single parents, compared with only 17 who
went to a 1997 roundtable. Another conference on the topic, to be held next month in San
Antonio, is expected to draw 200.
"There is a trend where churches are getting back to the heart and the gospel,"
says Wendy Wright of Concerned Women for America (CWA), which promotes religious values in
everyday life. "When it comes down to it, we all have something in our life to be
ashamed of," she says, noting a wider effort within the church community to lay aside
By some counts, only 5 percent of single parents attend church regularly, and, certainly,
churches hold a wide range of views on divorce and out-of-wedlock pregnancy. In some
conservative faiths, acknowledge religious experts, it's a "fine balancing act"
to uphold biblical moral standards and, at the same time, minister to people who have
challenged that morality.
Yet many conservative religious leaders, including those tied to the 15-million-member
conservative Southern Baptist Convention, appear to support this new embrace of single
parents. "If you are going to be anti-abortion, then you absolutely must step up to
the plate and provide support for women who are alone, in need, and have been dumped by
men and by the law," says a spokesman at the Southern Baptist Seminary in Louisville,
The story says that, with an almost evangelical fervor, a number of churches are pitching
in to help single parents.
Half of all children in the child-care program at Christ Our Shepherd Ministries in
Matthews, N.C., come from single-parent families. The church recently reached out to bring
these moms into the congregation.
In Colorado Springs, Colo., Guardian Angels Child Care Ministry trains babysitters
and teaches other churches how they can subsidize children of single parents.
The First Baptist Church of Indian Rocks in Largo, Fla., bought an entire apartment
complex, turned it into a nonprofit organization, and now houses dozens of single-parent
families for free or reduced rent.
St. Croix Valley Christians in Action in Lake Elmo, Minn., offers a monthly car-care
session for single mothers. While mechanics in the congregation unsheathe wrenches, the
moms themselves are taught budget principles and other skills in a church classroom.
States, too, are beginning to aid churches that want to help poor, single parents. Texas
has agreed to fund some church programs aimed at providing help to families in trouble or
need an idea that has captivated church and lay leaders alike.
While the Roman Catholic Church, because of its institutional largess toward the poor, has
tended to look on single-parenthood with "more of a sense of realism," it too
has had to deal with the moral quandary presented by illegitimacy and divorce, says Clyde
Crews, a history professor at Bellerman College in Louisville, Ky.
But many Protestant churches including the Baptists,
Methodists, Presbyterians, and evangelicals backed off tending to the needs of
broken families after the federal government began to take over that job in the 1930s.
Over time, church officials say, some of these churches came to treat single parents with
ambivalence, if not disdain.
The story points out that there have been blow-ups in vestries and pews over what is seen
as this new coddling of single parents.
"In one very reputable church in this area, this whole issue of bringing single
parents' needs to the church board caused one elder to resign on the spot," says
Jamie Pearce, the single-parent minister at Cary Church of God. "Many people still
have the mindset that [single parents] ... brought this sin on themselves."
Yet many conservative church leaders say the embrace of single parents given their
growing numbers in American society is long overdue.
"It's been human nature of the church to lean toward legalism, which is focusing on
rules and [the belief that] people who don't follow rules should be shunned, when that's
really not heart of Christianity," says Ms. Wright.
Indeed, churchgoing itself has changed dramatically over the past 50 years. The longtime
American cultural expectation that going to church on Sunday was what everyone did has
faded. To revive relevance, many churches in the past decade have started ministries aimed
at specific groups: teenagers, single adults, and the divorced.
But churches never completely abandoned single parents and their children, especially in
Bill Leonard, dean of Wake Forest Divinity School in Winston-Salem, N.C., recalls his
childhood days in the 1950s in a small Texas town, when a man from his community church
would fetch him for weekly Sunday picnics. The man whom Mr. Leonard recalls only as
"Mr. Wilkerson" stepped in to help after divorce split Leonard's parents.
In fact, many churches, especially in the genteel South, have always helped single-parent
families even if somewhat covertly. "They didn't organize elaborate programs,
lest they embarrass families," Leonard says. "True enough, there was a time when
the church was insensitive [to single-parent households]. But I think many church members
also knew well what the culture would bear."