WayneCROP.jpg (26664 bytes)      

 

 

Wayne Salvador
Section-Editor

email.gif (17066 bytes)
Comments &
Suggestions

 

 

Contact Information for
Your Congress member

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Information for
Your Congress member

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Information for
Your Congress member

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Information for
Your Congress member

 

 

 

 

 

spotlights-shine-right.gif (4712 bytes)

Legislation to Watch
capitol.jpg (47970 bytes)

spotlights-shine-left.gif (4562 bytes)

During the 2002 legislative session, AASP will monitor, analyze and report to our members and to the public on the status of legislation affecting single and unmarried adults, couples, parents, and families.

Single people may want to study and monitor the progress of the following bills which are pending in Congress and in state legislatures.

The American Association for Single People does not lobby for or against specific legislation.  We monitor and analyze bills and provide periodic reports to our members and to the public on the status of legislation which may affect the rights and well being of single and unmarried adults.   This service is one of many educational programs of AASP.  Lobbying is an activity of our legislative advocacy affiliate, Singles Rights Lobby.

Congress

 

Domestic partner benefits for federal workers

    HR 638
    Author:
Rep. Barney Frank

                    2210 Rayburn House Office Building
                    Washington, D.C. 20515
                    (202) 225-5931

    Purpose: Would provide health and other work benefits to domestic partners of federal employees just as spouses of federal workers receive benefits.  Also would make such benefits exempt from federal income tax just as spousal benefits are tax exempt.  As presently written, two unmarried adults may qualify as domestic partners, regardless of the gender of the partners.
    Last action:  referred to two committees on Feb. 14, 2001
    Status: 
pending in House Committee on Gvt. Reform and Committee on Ways and Means

 

Amend Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to include care of domestic partner

    HR 2287
    Author:
Rep. Carolyn Maloney

                    2430 Rayburn House Office Building
                    Washington, D.C. 20515
                    (202) 225-7944

    Purpose: Would amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to permit leave to care for a domestic partner, parent-in-law, adult child, sibling, or grandparent if the domestic partner, parent-in-law, adult child, sibling, or grandparent has a serious health condition
    Actions taken:
referred to three committees on June 21, 2001: House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Committee on Government Reform and Committee on House Administration.
September 18, 2001, House Committee on Education and Workforce refers bill to Sub-committee on Workforce Protection; House Committee of Government Reform refers bill to Sub-committee on Civil Service and Agency Organization.
    Status:
pending in committee

 

Tax equity for Domestic Partners Act of 2001

    HR 2837
    Author:
Rep. James A. McDermott

                    1035 Longworth House Office Building
                    Washington, D.C. 20515
                    (202) 225-3106

    Purpose: Would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion from an employee's gross income for employer provided health coverage of the employee's spouse to coverage provided to the employee's domestic partner.
    Actions taken:  introduce September 5, 2001; referred to House Committee on Ways and Means
    Status: 
pending in committee

 

Immigration for same-sex permanent partners of US citizens

    HR 690
    Author:
Rep. Jerrold Nadler

                    2334 Rayburn House Office Building
                    Washington, D.C. 20515
                    (202) 225-5635

    Purpose: Would provide allow "permanent partners" of US citizens to immigrate to the United States, provided that the partners are of the same sex, just as spouses of US citizens may immigrate to this country.
    Actions taken: 
referred to two committees on Feb. 14, 2001
referred to subcommittee on March 2, 2001
    Status: 
pending in House Committee on Gvt. Reform and Committee on Ways and Means
pending in Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims

 

Amendment to the Violence Against Women Act of 2000

    S 410
    Author:
Senator Mike Crapo
                  
111 Russell Senate Office Building
                   Washington, DC  20510
                   202-224-6142 / FAX  202-228-1375

    Purpose: Would expand the legal assistance for victims of violence grant program to include legal assistance for  victims of dating violence
    Actions taken: 
introduced on Feb. 28, 2001
referred to Committee on the Judiciary
April 25, 2002, Committee favorably reports without amendments
May 7, 2002; Passed Senate without amendments by unanimous consent
May 8, 2002; received by House and referred to House Judiciary Committee
    Status: 
pending in House Committee on the Judiciary

 

Setting up private Social Security investment accounts for workers

    HR 2771
    Author:
Rep. Jim Kolbe

                  
2266 Rayburn House Office Building
                   Washington, DC 20515
                   202-225-2542

    Purpose: Would amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for individual security accounts funded by employee and employer Social Security payroll deductions, to extend the solvency of the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program and for other purposes.
    Actions taken: 
referred to two committees on August 2, 2001
August 8, 2001, House Committee on Ways and Means refers resolution to Sub-committee on Social Security
    Status: 
pending in committee

 

Nondiscrimination in Employee Benefits Act of 2001

    HR 515
    Author:
Rep. Thomas E. Petri

                  
2462 Rayburn House Office Building
                   Washington, DC 20515
                   202-225-2476

    Purpose: Would require that employers offering benefits to associates of its employees who are not spouses or dependents of the employees not discriminate on the basis of the nature of the relationship between the employee and the designated associates.
    Actions taken: 
February 7, 2001;referred to House Committee on Education and the Workforce
March 29, 2001; referred to the Subcommittee on Employer-Employee relations
    Status: 
pending in committee

 

Homemaker Employment Assistance and Lifeskills Act

    HR 2489
    Author:
Rep. Melissa Hart

                  
1508 Longworth House Office Building
                   Washington, DC 20515
                   202-225-2565

    Purpose: Would provide effective training and education programs for displaced homemakers, single parents, and individuals entering nontraditional employment.
    Actions taken: 
July 12, 2001;referred to House Committee on Education and the Workforce
November 2, 2001; referred to the Subcommittee on 21st Century Competitiveness
    Status: 
pending in committee

 

Anti-Hypocrisy Act of 2001

    HR 3291
    Author:
Rep. Barney Frank

                  
2252 Rayburn House Office Building
                   Washington, DC 20515
                   202-225-5931

    Purpose: Would amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that consensual sexual activity between adults shall not be a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
    Actions taken: 
November 14, 2001;referred to House Committee on Armed Services
    Status: 
pending in committee

 


States

Repeal of Anti-Cohabitation Statute and Sodomy Laws

Massachusetts

    HB 847
    Author:
Representative David Paul Linsky
                   State House, Room 473-F
                   Boston, MA 02133

                   (617) 722-2210

                   Rep.DavidLinsky@hou.state.ma.us
    Purpose: Would repeal the sodomy laws (subsections 18, 34, 35 of Chapter 272)  of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on fornication, crimes against nature and unnatural and lascivious act. The aforementioned acts are  punishable by a fine or jail term.
    Actions taken:
introduced on January 3, 2001; referred to Committee on Judiciary
July 2, 2001; accompanied study order H4280
    Status: pending in committee

 

Virginia

HB 1081
    Author:
Delegate Robert H. Brink
                   General Assembly Bldg Rm. 817
                   Capitol Square  
                   Richmond, VA 23219

    Purpose: Would decriminalize sodomy between consenting adults with the exception that sodomy in public would remain a Class 6 felony.  The bill also provides that solicitation of carnal knowledge would be a Class 6 felony.
    Actions taken:
introduced on January 9, 2002; referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
February 8, 2002 ; incorporated by Committee for Courts of Justice with HB 1140
    Status: pending in committee

 

    HB 1140
    Author:
Delegate James H. Dillard II
                   General Assembly Bldg Rm. 702
                   Capitol Square  
                   Richmond, VA 23219

                   del_Dillard@house.state.va.us
    Purpose: Would decriminalize sodomy between consenting adults with the exception that sodomy in public would remain a Class 6 felony.  The bill also provides that solicitation of carnal knowledge would be a Class 6 felony.
    Actions taken:
introduced on January 9, 2002; referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
February 8, 2002: passed by  indefinitely 18-3 in Committee for Courts of Justice.
    Status: died in committee

 


Inheritance tax repeal bills

New Jersey

   SB 1304
    Author:
Senator Robert W. Singer
                    2110 W. County Line Rd.
                    Jackson, NJ 08527
                    (732)-901-0702

    Purpose: Would enact a "Death Tax Elimination Act," to repeal the transfer inheritance tax.  Transfers to spouses or between parent and child were exempted from this tax in 1985.  Transfers from a single person to a sibling, niece, nephew, unmarried partner, or friend, are now taxed up to 16 percent.  The repeal of the death tax would therefore eliminate discrimination against single people.
    Last action: 
 introduced May 18, 2000
pending in Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee
    Status: died in committee

 

Indiana

  
SB 209
    Author: Senator David C. Ford
                    200 W. Washington St.
                    Indianapolis, IN 46204
                    (317) 232-9400

    Purpose: Would repeal inheritance tax on transfers of property from estates of persons who die after June 30, 2001.  This would have the effect of removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses.
    Last action: 
introduced January 9, 2001
pending in Senate Committee on Finance                
    Status: died in committee

   SB 191:
   Author:  Senator Joseph C. Zakas
                    200 W. Washington St.
                    Indianapolis, IN 46204
                    (317) 232-9400

    Purpose: Would phase out the inheritance tax over three years, eventually eliminating marital status discrimination in the current law due to spousal exemptions.
    Last action:
introduced January 9, 2001
pending in Senate Committee on Finance
    Status: died in committee 

   HB 1687
    Author:  Rep. Michael D. Smith
                    P.O. Box 1
                    Rensselaer, IN 47978
                    (800) 382-9841 (State House)

    Purpose: Would phase out the inheritance tax over five years, eventually eliminating marital status discrimination in the current law due to spousal exemptions.
    Last action: 
introduced January 17, 2001
pending in House Committee on Ways and Means
    Status: died in committee

    HB 1546
    Author:  Rep. Daniel A. Dumezich
                    1107 Turnberry Drive
                    Schererville, IN 46375
                    (800) 382-9841 (State House)

    Purpose: Would repeal inheritance tax on transfers of property from estates of persons who die after June 30, 2001.  This would have the effect of removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses as far as exemption from inheritance tax is concerned.
    Last action: 
introduced January 11, 2001
pending in House Committee on Ways and Means
    Status:  died in committee

 

Iowa

   SB 29
   Author:
  Senator Mary Lou Freeman
                    203 Villa Rd.
                    Alta, IA 51002
                    (712) 732-3781

    Purpose: Would repeal inheritance tax law effective July 1, 2001.  This would have the effect of removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses as far as exemption from inheritance tax is concerned.
    Last action: 
January 16, 2001
pending in Senate Committee on Ways and Means
    Status:   died in committee

Rhode Island

   HB 6616
   Author:
  Representative Carol  A. Mumford
                    141 Betty Pond Road
                    Hope, RI  02831
                    (401) 647-3251

    Purpose: Would repeal inheritance tax law  upon passage.  This would have the effect of removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses as far as exemption from inheritance tax is concerned.
    Last action: 
January 3, 2002
April 3, 2002  scheduled for hearing and consideration. continued.
    Status:  pending in House Committee on Finance

 

 

Wisconsin

   AB 605
   Author:
 Representative Scott R. Jensen
                    Room 211 West
                    State Capitol

                    P.O. Box 8952
                    Madison, WI  02831
                    (608) 266-3387

    Purpose: Would repeal inheritance tax law  upon passage.  This would have the effect of removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses as far as exemption from inheritance tax is concerned.
    Last action: 
introduced October 29, 2001; referred to Assembly Committee on Tax and Spending
November 1, 2001  public hearing held
January 24, 2002; Executive action taken
February 20; report passage recommended by Committee, referred to Joint Committee on Finance.
March 26, 2002, failed to pass Joint Committee on Finance
    Status:  failed

 


Prohibiting sellers of services from discriminating against consumers

New Jersey

    AB 142
    Author:
Assemblywoman Arline M. Friscia
                    249 Main St.
                    Woodbridge, NJ 07001
                    (732)-634-2526
    Purpose: Would prohibit discrimination with respect to prices charged by sellers of services against consumers on the basis of their marital status, familial status, sex, sexual orientation, age, race, creed, color, national origin, or ancestry.
    Last action: 
January 11, 2000
referred to Assembly Commerce Committee
    Status:   died in committee

 


Legislation to watch -- more -- page two

Legislation to watch: Signed into law 2001 archive
Legislation to watch: Failed to pass 2001  archive
Home Page What's New About AASP Contact AASP
Members Join AASP Guestbook Site Map