|
Wayne
Salvador
Section-Editor

Comments &
Suggestions
Contact Information for
Your Congress member
Contact Information for
Your Congress member
Contact Information for
Your Congress member
Contact Information for
Your Congress member
|
During the 2002 legislative session, AASP
will monitor, analyze and report to our members and to the public on the status of
legislation affecting single and unmarried adults, couples, parents, and families.
Single people may want to study and monitor
the progress of the following bills which are pending in Congress and in state
legislatures.
| The American Association for Single
People does not lobby for or against specific legislation. We monitor and analyze
bills and provide periodic reports to our members and to the public on the status of
legislation which may affect the rights and well being of single and unmarried adults.
This service is one of many educational programs of AASP. Lobbying is an
activity of our legislative advocacy affiliate, Singles Rights Lobby. |
Congress
Domestic partner benefits for
federal workers
HR 638
Author: Rep. Barney
Frank
2210 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-5931
Purpose:
Would provide health and other work benefits to domestic partners of federal employees
just as spouses of federal workers receive benefits. Also would make such benefits
exempt from federal income tax just as spousal benefits are tax exempt. As presently
written, two unmarried adults may qualify as domestic partners, regardless of the gender
of the partners.
Last action: referred to two committees on Feb.
14, 2001
Status:
pending in House Committee on Gvt. Reform and Committee on Ways and Means
Amend Family and Medical Leave Act
of 1993 to include care of domestic partner
HR 2287
Author: Rep. Carolyn
Maloney
2430 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-7944
Purpose:
Would amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to permit leave to care for a
domestic partner, parent-in-law, adult child, sibling, or grandparent if the domestic
partner, parent-in-law, adult child, sibling, or grandparent has a serious health
condition
Actions taken:
referred to three committees on June 21, 2001: House Committee on Education and the
Workforce, Committee on Government Reform and Committee on House Administration.
September 18, 2001, House Committee on Education and Workforce refers bill to
Sub-committee on Workforce Protection; House Committee of Government Reform refers bill to
Sub-committee on Civil Service and Agency Organization.
Status:
pending in committee
Tax equity for Domestic Partners
Act of 2001
HR 2837
Author: Rep. James
A. McDermott
1035 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-3106
Purpose:
Would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion from an employee's
gross income for employer provided health coverage of the employee's spouse to coverage
provided to the employee's domestic partner.
Actions taken: introduce September 5, 2001;
referred to House Committee on Ways and Means
Status:
pending in committee
Immigration for same-sex permanent
partners of US citizens
HR 690
Author: Rep. Jerrold
Nadler
2334 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-5635
Purpose:
Would provide allow "permanent partners" of US citizens to immigrate to the
United States, provided that the partners are of the same sex, just as spouses of US
citizens may immigrate to this country.
Actions taken:
referred to two committees on Feb. 14, 2001
referred to subcommittee on March 2, 2001
Status:
pending in House Committee on Gvt. Reform and Committee on Ways and Means
pending in Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims
Amendment to the Violence Against
Women Act of 2000
S 410
Author: Senator Mike
Crapo
111 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-6142 / FAX 202-228-1375
Purpose:
Would expand the legal assistance for victims of violence grant program to include legal
assistance for victims of dating violence
Actions taken:
introduced on Feb. 28, 2001
referred to Committee on the Judiciary
April 25, 2002, Committee favorably reports without amendments
May 7, 2002; Passed Senate without amendments by unanimous consent
May 8, 2002; received by House and referred to House Judiciary Committee
Status:
pending in House Committee on the Judiciary
Setting up private Social Security
investment accounts for workers
HR 2771
Author: Rep. Jim Kolbe
2266 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202-225-2542
Purpose:
Would amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for individual security
accounts funded by employee and employer Social Security payroll deductions, to extend the
solvency of the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program and for other
purposes.
Actions taken:
referred to two committees on August 2, 2001
August 8, 2001, House Committee on Ways and Means refers resolution to Sub-committee on
Social Security
Status:
pending in committee
Nondiscrimination in Employee
Benefits Act of 2001
HR 515
Author: Rep. Thomas E.
Petri
2462 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202-225-2476
Purpose:
Would require that employers offering benefits to associates of its employees who are not
spouses or dependents of the employees not discriminate on the basis of the nature of the
relationship between the employee and the designated associates.
Actions taken:
February 7, 2001;referred to House Committee on Education and the Workforce
March 29, 2001; referred to the Subcommittee on Employer-Employee relations
Status:
pending in committee
Homemaker Employment Assistance and
Lifeskills Act
HR 2489
Author: Rep. Melissa Hart
1508 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202-225-2565
Purpose:
Would provide effective training and education programs for displaced homemakers, single
parents, and individuals entering nontraditional employment.
Actions taken:
July 12, 2001;referred to House Committee on Education and the Workforce
November 2, 2001; referred to the Subcommittee on 21st Century Competitiveness
Status:
pending in committee
Anti-Hypocrisy Act of 2001
HR 3291
Author: Rep. Barney
Frank
2252 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
202-225-5931
Purpose:
Would amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that consensual sexual activity
between adults shall not be a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Actions taken:
November 14, 2001;referred to House Committee on Armed Services
Status:
pending in committee
|
| States Repeal of Anti-Cohabitation Statute and
Sodomy Laws
Massachusetts
HB
847
Author: Representative David Paul Linsky
State House, Room 473-F
Boston, MA 02133
(617) 722-2210
Rep.DavidLinsky@hou.state.ma.us
Purpose:
Would repeal the sodomy laws (subsections 18, 34, 35 of Chapter 272) of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts on fornication, crimes against nature and unnatural and
lascivious act. The aforementioned acts are punishable by a fine or jail term.
Actions taken:
introduced on January 3, 2001; referred to Committee on Judiciary
July 2, 2001; accompanied study order H4280
Status: pending in committee
Virginia
HB 1081
Author: Delegate Robert H. Brink
General Assembly Bldg Rm. 817
Capitol Square
Richmond, VA 23219
Purpose: Would decriminalize sodomy between
consenting adults with the exception that sodomy in public would remain a Class 6
felony. The bill also provides that solicitation of carnal knowledge would be a
Class 6 felony.
Actions taken:
introduced on January 9, 2002; referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
February 8, 2002 ; incorporated by Committee for Courts of Justice with HB 1140
Status: pending in committee
HB
1140
Author: Delegate James H. Dillard
II
General Assembly Bldg Rm. 702
Capitol Square
Richmond, VA 23219
del_Dillard@house.state.va.us
Purpose:
Would decriminalize sodomy between consenting adults with the exception that sodomy in
public would remain a Class 6 felony. The bill also provides that solicitation of
carnal knowledge would be a Class 6 felony.
Actions taken:
introduced on January 9, 2002; referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
February 8, 2002: passed by indefinitely 18-3 in Committee for Courts of Justice.
Status: died in committee
Inheritance tax repeal bills
New Jersey
SB
1304
Author: Senator
Robert W. Singer
2110 W. County Line Rd.
Jackson, NJ 08527
(732)-901-0702
Purpose:
Would enact a "Death Tax Elimination Act," to repeal the transfer inheritance
tax. Transfers to spouses or between parent and child were exempted from this tax in
1985. Transfers from a single person to a sibling, niece, nephew, unmarried partner,
or friend, are now taxed up to 16 percent. The repeal of the death tax would
therefore eliminate discrimination against single people.
Last action:
introduced May 18, 2000
pending in Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee
Status: died in committee
Indiana
SB 209
Author: Senator David
C. Ford
200 W. Washington St.
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 232-9400
Purpose: Would repeal inheritance tax on transfers of
property from estates of persons who die after June 30, 2001. This would have the
effect of removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers
between two single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses.
Last action:
introduced January 9, 2001
pending in Senate Committee on Finance
Status: died in committee
SB
191:
Author: Senator
Joseph C. Zakas
200 W. Washington St.
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 232-9400
Purpose:
Would phase out the inheritance tax over three years, eventually eliminating marital
status discrimination in the current law due to spousal exemptions.
Last action:
introduced January 9, 2001
pending in Senate Committee on Finance
Status: died in committee
HB
1687
Author: Rep. Michael D. Smith
P.O. Box 1
Rensselaer, IN 47978
(800) 382-9841 (State House)
Purpose:
Would phase out the inheritance tax over five years, eventually eliminating marital status
discrimination in the current law due to spousal exemptions.
Last action:
introduced January 17, 2001
pending in House Committee on Ways and Means
Status: died in committee
HB
1546
Author: Rep. Daniel A. Dumezich
1107 Turnberry Drive
Schererville, IN 46375
(800) 382-9841 (State House)
Purpose:
Would repeal inheritance tax on transfers of property from estates of persons who die
after June 30, 2001. This would have the effect of removing marital status
discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two single people would be
treated the same as transfers between spouses as far as exemption from inheritance tax is
concerned.
Last action:
introduced January 11, 2001
pending in House Committee on Ways and Means
Status: died in committee
Iowa
SB
29
Author: Senator
Mary Lou Freeman
203 Villa Rd.
Alta,
IA 51002
(712)
732-3781
Purpose:
Would repeal inheritance tax law effective July 1, 2001. This would have the effect
of removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two
single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses as far as exemption
from inheritance tax is concerned.
Last action:
January 16, 2001
pending in Senate Committee on Ways and Means
Status: died in committee
Rhode Island
HB 6616
Author:
Representative Carol A. Mumford
141 Betty Pond Road
Hope,
RI 02831
(401)
647-3251
Purpose:
Would repeal inheritance tax law upon passage. This would have the effect of
removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two
single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses as far as exemption
from inheritance tax is concerned.
Last action:
January 3, 2002
April 3, 2002 scheduled for hearing and consideration. continued.
Status: pending in House Committee on Finance
Wisconsin
AB
605
Author: Representative Scott R.
Jensen
Room 211 West
State
Capitol
P.O. Box 8952
Madison, WI 02831
(608)
266-3387
Purpose:
Would repeal inheritance tax law upon passage. This would have the effect of
removing marital status discrimination from the law inasmuch as transfers between two
single people would be treated the same as transfers between spouses as far as exemption
from inheritance tax is concerned.
Last action:
introduced October 29, 2001; referred to Assembly Committee on Tax and Spending
November 1, 2001 public hearing held
January 24, 2002; Executive action taken
February 20; report passage recommended by Committee, referred to Joint Committee on
Finance.
March 26, 2002, failed to pass Joint Committee on Finance
Status: failed
Prohibiting sellers of services from
discriminating against consumers
New Jersey
AB 142
Author: Assemblywoman Arline M. Friscia
249 Main St.
Woodbridge, NJ 07001
(732)-634-2526
Purpose:
Would prohibit discrimination with respect to prices charged by sellers of services
against consumers on the basis of their marital status, familial status, sex, sexual
orientation, age, race, creed, color, national origin, or ancestry.
Last action:
January 11, 2000
referred to Assembly Commerce Committee
Status: died in committee
Legislation to watch -- more --
page two |
Legislation to
watch: Signed into law 2001 archive
Legislation
to watch: Failed to pass 2001 archive |
|